【IAS&FLL】Lecture on “Arbitration Across Human Faculties and Human Societies: A Three-Dimensional Epistemological Analysis” was successfully conducted

【高研院&法學院】講座"Arbitration Across Human Faculties and Human Societies: A Three-Dimensional Epistemological Analysis"圓滿舉行

由高研院與法學院聯合舉辦的講座於2024年5月10日成功舉辦。此次講座主題為“Arbitration Across Human Faculties and Human Societies: A Three-Dimensional Epistemological Analysis”,由新南威爾士大學樊堃教授主講,高研院院長、法學院講座教授於興中教授則擔任主持人。

本次講座中,樊教授著重介紹了“仲裁”的研究背景及其重要性。她首先介紹了“仲裁”的由來和發展,提到了實踐層面和學術層面關於“仲裁”討論的熱點話題。傳統學者們對仲裁的討論總是圍繞著法律程式和制度層面,但樊教授認為考慮更廣泛的文化、社會、歷史層面也同樣重要。她指出,西方社會的法律傳統為仲裁提供了哲學基礎,使其發展成為一種基於共同的理性和客觀規則的解決方式。然而,如果我們把目光轉向中國這樣的國家,很難在其歷史中找到“仲裁”這一概念的體現。隨後,樊教授介紹了一套更具包容性的理論框架,對中西方就“仲裁”的解讀做出了區分,西方講求理性,而中方更注重和諧。樊教授還討論了法律民事秩序和道德民事秩序的區別,談論了仲裁員在仲裁中的地位和重要性,並闡述了這套理論框架的實用價值。最後樊教授總結道,中國正積極參與投資者國家爭端解決改革,調解與仲裁的結合也在世界範圍內被越來越多的人所接受,仲裁的未來將是一個全球化的過程,在這個過程中,全球規範將擁抱地方傳統。

在討論環節,教授們針對“全球本土化是否屬於一種文化競爭”、“三維認識論框架的真正用例及對中國仲裁機制的影響”等問題展開了討論。樊教授認為,仲裁是屬於當事人的仲裁,仲裁過程中應當將用戶期望納入考慮。來自不同文化背景的仲裁員們的加入,使得對於一些分歧的包容性正在發生。於教授則用曾經看到過的一張照片,對現如今中國的法律現狀做出了解讀,有封建元素,也有現代、後現代元素,歸根結底是一種融合。樊教授也表示認同,在全球化盛行的背景下,仲裁也反映了一些中國傳統。

本次講座吸引了來自不同領域、不同背景的學生和教研人員,現場反響熱烈。

A joint lecture organized by the Institute of Advanced Studies in Humanities and Social Sciences (IAS) and the Faculty of Law (FLL) was successfully held on May 10, 2024. The lecture was titled “Arbitration Across Human Faculties and Human Societies: A Three-Dimensional Epistemological Analysis” and was delivered by Professor Fan Kun from the University of New South Wales. Professor Yu Xingzhong, Director of IAS and Chair Professor of the Faculty of Law, acted as the moderator.

In this lecture, Prof. Fan highlighted the research background and importance of it. She firstly introduced the origin and development of “arbitration”, and mentioned the hot topics of “arbitration” discussed at both the practical and academic levels. While traditional scholars’ discussion of arbitration always centers on legal procedures and institutions, Prof. Fan believes that it is equally important to consider the broader cultural, social and historical dimensions. She pointed out that the legal tradition of Western societies has provided a philosophical foundation for arbitration, allowing it to develop into a form of settlement based on common rationality and objective rules. However, if we look at a country like China, it is difficult to find the concept of “arbitration” reflected in its history. Prof. Fan then presented a more inclusive theoretical framework, distinguishing between Western and Chinese interpretations of “arbitration”, with the Western side emphasizing rationality and the Chinese side focusing on harmony. Prof. Fan also discussed the difference between legal and moral civil order, the status and importance of arbitrators in arbitration, and the practical value of this theoretical framework. Finally, Prof. Fan concluded that China is actively participating in dispute resolution reforms, and that the combination of mediation and arbitration is becoming more and more accepted around the world, and that the future of arbitration will be a globalized process, in which global norms will embrace local traditions.

In the discussion session, the professors discussed issues such as “whether glocalization is a cultural competition”, “the real use cases of the three-dimensional epistemological framework and the impact on China’s arbitration mechanism”. Prof. Fan argued that arbitration is an arbitration of the parties and that user expectations should be taken into account in the arbitration process. The inclusion of arbitrators from different cultural backgrounds has led to an inclusiveness of some disagreements. Prof. Yu, on the other hand, used a photo he once saw to explain the current state of law in China today, with feudal elements as well as modern and post-modern elements, which is ultimately a kind of fusion. Prof. Fan also agreed that arbitration reflects some Chinese traditions in the context of prevailing globalization.

The lecture attracted students and faculty members from different fields and backgrounds, and the audience demonstrated a high level of interest and engagement.