UM Cantonese Debating Team won the Cantonese Debating Competition with Hang Seng University of Hong Kong Second Year in a Row

澳門大學廣東話辯論隊連續兩年勝出恒澳廣東話辯論交流賽

澳門大學廣東話辯論隊連續兩年勝出恒澳廣東話辯論交流賽

澳門大學廣東話辯論隊於3月24日在香港恒生大學舉行“恒澳廣東話辯論交流賽”。是次活動目的是與香港恒生大學辯論隊互相切磋及交流,以促進雙方辯技。

是次比賽的辯題為港府應立法推行社區治療令,正方澳門大學派出主辯工商管理學院一年級及馬萬祺羅柏心書院黃煒喆、第一副辯教育學院三年級及蔡繼有書院黃穎輝、第二副辯社會科學學院三年級及紹邦書院邱垚源、結辯法學院一年級及滿珍紀念書院羅仲謙以及台下發問人文學院二年級及紹邦書院曹梓樂和科技學院一年級及霍英東珍禧書院李金燕。

正方主要提出香港精神問題嚴重,導致社會事件頻發,反映出現時對於精神病患的保障有所不足,需要推行社區治療令以填補漏洞,並且透過立法手段可以令社會更正視精神問題,達成社會共識以投入更多資源:反方則質疑若立法推行社區治療令,必然要運用大量資源,但現時資源不足,難以執行,更甚會標籤病患侵犯人權。

比賽結果為2:1由正方澳門大學勝出,過程中正方法學院一年級及滿珍紀念書院的羅仲謙更斬獲最佳辯論員獎項。

UM Cantonese Debating Team won the Cantonese Debating Competition with Hang Seng University of Hong Kong Second Year in a Row

UM Cantonese Debating Team participated in the “Hang Seng University of Hong Kong-Macau University Cantonese Debating Competition” held on 24th March in Hong Kong. The purpose of this event was to engage in mutual learning and exchange with the debating team from Hang Seng University of Hong Kong, in order to promote the skills of both teams.

The debating topic for this competition was whether the Hong Kong government should legislate for the implementation of community treatment orders. The affirmative team from the University of Macau consisted of the first speaker, Wong Wai Chit from FBA & MLC; the second speaker, Wong Weng Fai from FED & CKYC; the third speaker, QIU YaoYuan from the FSS & SPC; the concluding speaker, Lo Chong Him, from FLL & MCMC; and the questioners, Chou Chi Lok from FHS & SPC, and Lei Kam In from FST & HFPJC.

The affirmative team primarily argued that there is a serious issue with the Hong Kong mentality, leading to frequent social incidents. They pointed out the inadequacy of current safeguards for mental patients and emphasized the need to implement community treatment orders to fill in the gaps. They also argued that legislation can raise awareness of mental health issues in society and achieve social consensus, leading to increased resource allocation. On the other hand, the negative team questioned the feasibility of implementing community treatment orders due to insufficient resources, emphasizing the potential violation of patients’ rights and the labeling of patients.

In the end, the University of Macau affirmative team won the debate with a score of 2:1, Lo Chong Him, a Year 1 student from FLL & MCMC, was awarded the Best Debater award during the competition.

Group Photo 大合照