The University of Macau Cantonese Debating Performance Contest concluded successfully
澳門大學廣東話辯論表演賽圓滿落幕 激辯火花點燃S8薈萃坊
澳門大學廣東話辯論表演賽圓滿落幕 激辯火花點燃S8薈萃坊
由澳門大學廣東話語論議主辦的「澳大廣東話辯論表演賽」於2月10日在S8薈萃坊地面層熱烈展開,歷經一個半小時的激烈交鋒,最終正方以「預防大學生被騙的主要責任在於政府」為題,憑藉紮實的論證與犀利的反駁奪得勝利。活動不僅吸引近半百名師生參與,每位參賽者都以自信大方的臺風、新穎獨特的觀點展現了自己對主題的深刻感悟。
經過激烈的角逐,最終正方-澳門大學A隊法學院一年級學生、霍英東珍禧書院書院的正方主辯陳穎芝,社會科學學院三年級學生、霍英東珍禧書院書院的正方一副馮卓楠,社會科學學院四年級學生、紹邦書院的正方二副邱垚源,法學院一年級學生、何鴻燊書院書院的正方結辯區家豐獲勝,而社會科學學院四年級學生、紹邦書院的正方二副邱垚源榮獲最佳辯論員。
本次辯題緊扣社會現狀,正方從政策制定、資源整合及法律執行三大層面展開攻勢。一針見血指出,政府擁有制定防詐騙法規的權力,且能透過跨部門合作(如警務、教育、通訊監管)建立全面防護網;反方雖強調個人警覺與家庭教育的重要性,卻未能有效反駁政府「系統性防控」的不可替代性。正方更列舉澳門近年詐騙案例數據,強調唯有政府主導的頂層設計,才能從根源降低大學生受害風險。
本次比賽亦獲得了來自各個學院同學的熱烈支持,相信不論是參賽選手還是觀眾都通過這次比賽感受到了演講的魅力與演講內容傳遞出的思想力量。
歡迎加入澳大廣東話辯論隊大家庭!
學生事務部
學生資源處
以上資料中英文如有歧義,一律以中文版本為準。
The University of Macau Cantonese Debating Performance Contest concluded successfully
The University of Macau Cantonese Debaing Performance Contest concluded successfully, with the sparks of intense debate igniting the atmosphere at S8 University Mall.
The Cantonese Debating Performance Contest organized by the University of Macau’s Cantonese Debating Team successfully concluded on February 10th at the ground floor of S8 UMall. After 1.5 hours of intense competition, the affirmative team emerged victorious with their argument: “The primary responsibility for preventing university students from being scammed lies with the government”. The event attracted over 50 teachers and students, with each participant showcasing their deep understanding of the topic through confident and poised stage presence, as well as unique and innovative viewpoints.
After a fierce competition, the championship was awarded to the affirmative team, which included first-year law student CHAN WENG CHI from the Henry Fok Pearl Jubilee College, third-year social sciences student FONG CHEOK NAM from the Henry Fok Pearl Jubilee College, fourth-year social sciences student QIU YAOYUAN from Shiu Pong College, and first-year law student AO KA FONG from Stanley Ho East Asia College. QIU YAOYUAN was also honored as the best debater.
The debating topic was closely related to current social issues. The affirmative team launched their arguments from three major perspectives: policy formulation, resource integration, and law enforcement. They pointed out incisively that the government has the authority to enact anti-fraud regulations and can establish a comprehensive protective network through interdepartmental cooperation (such as police, education, and communication regulation). Although the opposing team emphasized the importance of personal vigilance and family education, they failed to effectively counter the irreplaceable role of the government’s “systemic prevention and control.” The affirmative team cited recent fraud case data in Macau, emphasizing that only government-led top-level design can fundamentally reduce the risk of university students falling victim to scams.
The competition also received enthusiastic support from students across various faculties. It is believed that both the participants and the audience experienced the charm of public speaking and the intellectual power conveyed through the content of the speeches.
Welcome to join UM Cantonese Debating Team Family!
Student Affairs Office
Student Resources Section
Remarks: In the event of any discrepancies between the English and Chinese versions, the Chinese version shall prevail.