News Express: UM Macao Humanities Forum explores Confucianism and Confucius
新聞快訊:澳大鏡海人文論壇探討儒家與孔子
陳致
Chen Zhi
澳大鏡海人文論壇探討儒家與孔子
澳門大學人文學院於2025年2月20日舉辦“鏡海人文論壇”,由北京師範大學—香港浸會大學聯合國際學院校長、講座教授陳致以“先有孔子才有儒家,還是先有儒家才有孔子”為題發表演講,吸引眾多師生參與。
論壇上,澳大人文學院助理院長鄺耀基致辭指,儒家思想是中華文化的重要傳統,其中孔子提出的“有教無類”、儒家提倡的“中庸有為”,在21世紀仍具重要啟迪作用。澳大人文學院副院長張健介紹陳致的學術背景及成就,指出他是國際知名的文史及漢學研究學者,其學術研究涵蓋古典文學研究、中國早期文化與歷史、中國古代詩歌、出土文獻與古文字(金文與簡帛文字)、明清思想史等,其講座主要探討“儒家與孔子”的種種問題,關涉文學、哲學、經學,貫穿古今、溝通中西,能為師生開闊學術視野。
陳致由“儒”與“儒者”、“儒家”、“儒學”之別發問:究竟是“儒”先於孔子,還是“儒”因孔子之學派而生。他根據古代對“儒”的記載,追溯“儒”的歷史,指出“儒”起初並非單指儒家學派,而是指一個行當,或某類群體,或某個社會階層,出現早於孔子;近現代學術對於“儒”的研究,也不乏對“儒”與“儒家”之別的探討。從作為職業類別的“儒”,發展為作為思想流派的“儒家”,孔子在這一進程中所處的地位,是思想史研究的關鍵問題。陳致指出,近代考古成果,如海昏侯墓的發現,為研究孔子及其所處時代提供了新材料,將進一步推動孔子之儒學的研究。孔子時代的“儒”是否為知識階層的主流,孔子以後儒家在社會中狀態的變化等問題,都將進一步得到解答。
在問答環節,澳大師生就儒家在漢初的社會地位、殷商祖先崇拜的神鬼體系到周代關注世俗世界的轉向、莊子對儒“以詩禮發冢”的評價、“儒”作為殷商後代與周朝子民的雙重身份、漢代學術建構對儒學在中國學術史中定位的意義等內容,與陳致進行深入探討。陳致強調了考古,尤其是中國古代巫術與醫學體系的深入研究對思想史挖掘的意義,並期望有志者參與其中,為學界帶來新的研究成果。
這是“鏡海人文論壇”2024/2025學年的第四講。論壇每學年都會邀請不同領域的知名人文學者,與師生分享前沿研究成果。過往的論壇主題涵蓋文學、語言學、歷史、翻譯、藝術等多個領域。
欲瀏覽官網版可登入以下連結:
https://www.um.edu.mo/zh-hant/news-and-press-releases/press-release/detail/60551/
UM Macao Humanities Forum explores Confucianism and Confucius
The Faculty of Arts and Humanities (FAH) of the University of Macau (UM) held the Macao Humanities Forum on 20 February 2025, where Chen Zhi, president and chair professor of Beijing Normal University-Hong Kong Baptist University United International College (UIC), delivered a lecture titled ‘Was Confucius the founder to the Ru school, or did the Ruists exist before Confucius?’. The lecture attracted a large audience of faculty and students.
Speaking at the event, Joaquim Kuong, assistant dean of FAH, noted that Confucian thought is an important part of Chinese culture, and that the concepts such as ‘education for all without discrimination’ proposed by Confucius, and the ‘doctrine of the mean’ advocated by Confucianism remain profoundly inspiring in the 21st century. Zhang Jian, associate dean of FAH, introduced Prof Chen’s academic background and achievements, as well as his international reputation as a scholar of Chinese literature, Chinese history, and Sinology. Prof Chen’s research covers the study of classical Chinese literature, early Chinese culture and history, ancient Chinese poetry, excavated documents and ancient scripts, and the intellectual history of the Ming and Qing dynasties. Prof Zhang added that the lecture aimed to discuss various issues related to Confucianism and Confucius, bridging literature, philosophy, and classical studies, while combining ancient and modern perspectives as well as Chinese and Western thought, thus broadening the audience’s academic horizons.
Prof Chen began by exploring the distinction between ru (Confucian), ruzhe (ru scholars), rujia (the ru school of thought), and ruxue (Confucianism). He posed a question as indicated by the title of the lecture ‘Was Confucius the founder to the Ru school, or did the Ruists exist before Confucius?’. Drawing on ancient records, Prof Chen traced the historical evolution of ru, pointing out that the term originally denoted neither a tradition nor a philosophy, but rather a profession, a social group, or a social class that existed long before Confucius. He also noted that modern scholarship has also explored the distinction between ru and rujia.
Prof Chen emphasised that understanding Confucius’ role in transforming ru from a profession into a philosophical system is central to the study of intellectual history. Recent archaeological discoveries, such as the tomb of the Marquis of Haihun, provide new material for the study of Confucius and his era, which will further enhance the study of Confucianism. Questions such as whether ru represented the mainstream of the intellectual class in Confucius’ time and the subsequent changes in the social status of the ru school are expected to be further clarified.
During the Q&A session, UM faculty and students engaged in in-depth discussions with Prof Chen on a variety of topics, including the social status of the ru school in the early Han dynasty; religious practice during the Shang and Zhou dynasties and the shift in focus to the secular world during the Zhou dynasty; Zhuangzi’s criticism of ru scholars as ‘hypocrites’; the dual identity of ru scholars as descendants of the Shang dynasty and residents of the Zhou dynasty; and the importance of academic development during the Han dynasty in positioning Confucianism within Chinese intellectual history. Prof Chen emphasised the importance of archaeological research, particularly the study of ancient Chinese shamanism and medical systems, in uncovering insights into intellectual history, and he encouraged aspiring scholars to conduct research in this field and contribute new findings to the academic community.
This was the fourth lecture of the Macao Humanities Forum for the 2024/2025 academic year. Each year, the forum invites prominent scholars in different fields of the humanities to share their latest research findings with students and faculty members in Macao. Previous lectures of the forum have covered a wide range of topics, including literature, linguistics, history, translation, and arts.
To read the news on UM’s official website, please visit the following link:
https://www.um.edu.mo/news-and-press-releases/press-release/detail/60551/