UM Cantonese Debating Team organized Training Camp 2025 Successfully
sandysou2025-04-15T16:47:10+08:00澳大廣東話辯論隊順利完成新人訓練營2025
澳門大學廣東話辯論隊於3月29至30日在珠海舉行為期兩日的新人訓練營。是次活動目的主要讓新成員親身體驗一場模擬正式辯論比賽，以及增進隊內成員的默契。是次模擬辯論比賽圍繞「在家工作利大於弊」及「本澳開徵含糖飲料稅利大於弊」兩大政策議題展開深度交鋒。
第一場正方是由健康科學學院、張崑崙書院的梁宇繽；工商管理學院、張崑崙書院的源子俊；社會科學學院、霍英東珍禧書院的馮卓楠；以及健康科學學院、曹光彪書院的溫曉盈所組成的澳門大學A隊。反方則為澳門大學B隊，成員包括法學院、滿珍紀念書院的賴嘉誠；法學院、張崑崙書院的林曉賢；科技學院、曹光彪書院的裴先銘；以及教育學院、呂志和書院的楊志禧。
第二場正方是由法學院、何鴻燊東亞書院的司徒小柔；法學院、何鴻燊東亞書院的陳凱銘；法學院、霍英東珍禧書院的陳穎芝所組成的澳門大學C隊。反方則為澳門大學D隊，成員包括科技學院、霍英東珍禧書院的李金燕；法學院、何鴻燊東亞書院的區嘉豐；法學院、馬萬祺羅柏心書院的余偉弘。
首場辯論中，正方強調通勤減壓、人才流動及家庭福祉提升；反方揭露隱性管理成本激增與社會原子化危機，最終反方澳門大學B隊以2:5勝出，溫曉盈憑藉精闢的分析奪得最佳辯論員。次場正方主張徵稅可抑制高糖消費並轉化為醫療福利；反方則抨擊政策將衝擊中小企業、加劇消費外流，並提出以營養標籤等柔性措施替代，最終正方澳門大學C隊以7:0獲勝，陳穎芝獲評最佳辯論員。兩場辯論展現辯手結合實證與人文關懷的思辨力。
歡迎加入澳大廣東話辯論隊大家庭!
學生事務部
學生資源處
以上資料中英文如有歧義，一律以中文版本為準。
UM Cantonese Debating Team organized Training Camp 2025 Successfully
The Macau University Cantonese Debating Team (CDT) held a two-day orientation camp in Zhuhai from 29 to 30 March. The purpose of this activity is to allow new members to experience a mock formal debate competition and enhance the understanding among team members.
The mock debate competition focused on two major policy issues: “The benefits of working from home outweigh the disadvantages” and “The benefits of introducing a tax on sugary drinks in Macao outweigh the disadvantages”. The first debate was presented by LIANG U PAN of the Faculty of Health Sciences and Cheong Kun Lun College; UN CHI CHON, the Faculty of Business Administration and Cheong Kun Lun College; FONG CHEOK NAM, the Faculty of Social Sciences and Henry Fok Pearl Jubilee College; And the University of Macau Team A composed of VAN HIO IENG from the Faculty of Health Sciences and Chao Kuang Piu College. The opposing team was the University of Macau Team B, consisting of LAI KA SENG of the Faculty of Law and Moon Chun Memorial College; LAM HIO IN of Faculty of Law and Cheong Kun Lun College; PUI SIN MENG, Faculty of Science and Technology and the Chao Kuang Piu College; And IEONG CHI HEI of the Faculty of Education and Lui Che Woo College. SI TOU SIO IAO presented the second debate from the Faculty of Law and Stanley Ho East Asia College; CHEN HOI MENG, the Faculty of Law and the Stanley Ho East Asia College; the University of Macau Tteam C, composed of CHAN WENG CHI from the Faculty of Law and Henry Fok Pearl Jubilee College. The opposing team was the University of Macau Team D, consisting of LEI KAM IN from the Faculty of Science and Technology and Henry Fok Pearl Jubilee College; AO KA FONG, the Faculty of Law and Stanley Ho East Asia College; U WAI WANG, the Faculty of Law and Ma Man Kei and Lo Pak Sam College.
In the first debate, the pros emphasized commuting stress reduction, talent mobility, and family well-being improvement; The opposition exposed the hidden management cost surge and the social atomization crisis, and finally, the opposition the University of Macau Team B won 2:5, and VAN HIO IENG won the best debater with his incisive analysis. The second field advocates that the tax can curb high sugar consumption and translate into medical benefits; The opposing side attacked the policy as hitting small and medium-sized enterprises and increasing the outflow of consumption and proposed to replace it with flexible measures such as nutrition labeling. In the end, the University of Macau Team C narrowly won 7:0, and CHAN WENG CHI was awarded the best debater. The two debates demonstrated the debaters’ ability to combine empirical and humanistic care.
Welcome to join UM Cantonese Debating Team Family!
Student Affairs Office
Student Resources Section
Remarks: In the event of any discrepancies between the English and Chinese versions, the Chinese version shall prevail.
